indicated a letter of protest from the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance (SUWA) to the BLM
regarding an application to expand the mine stated the company should not mine within lands
proposed for wilderness designation by SUWA. He said the company tried to find gypsum in an
alternative area suggested by SUWA, but there was a problem with the quantity, quality, and
access. Therefore, the company elected to mine at their present location. He said they will be
out of gypsum on their five-acre permitted area this fall. He asked the committee to support the
application for mining.
Mr. Tom Bingham, Utah Mining Association, commented that the areas proposed for
gypsum mining are not wilderness study areas and yet there are several applications that have
been denied on that basis. He encouraged the committee to support the proposals.
Mr. Lee Taylor, United States Gypsum Company, said the company in the past served 54
percent of the market in Salt Lake City. They are now down to 25 percent. He asserted it is
important to be able to service the community with in-state reserves.
Rep. Carlson explained that she was not opposed to the mining but expressed her concern
that she did not know enough about the land in question.
MOTION: Rep. Iverson moved to support the efforts to obtain the necessary permits to mine gypsum in the areas in question. The motion passed with Rep. Carlson voting in
opposition.
MOTION: Rep. Gowans moved to approve the minutes of May 21, 1997. The motion passed unanimously. Rep. Wright was absent during the vote.
3. Wildlife Proclamations - Mr. John Kimball, Division of Wildlife Resources, distributed a document outlining the proclamation review process. He explained that the administrative
rules coordinator determines if the existing proclamation is consistent with other proclamations,
legislative changes, the Utah Code, and language required by the Division of Administrative Rules. A basic document is then drafted and sent to the Regional Advisory Councils (RACs) for
public review. Issues are discussed and voted on by the RACs. A rough draft is then prepared
and sent to the Wildlife Board for its approval.
Any action taken by the RACs must be followed by the Wildlife Board or the board is required to give an explanation why it did not follow a
RAC recommendation.
The rules coordinator prepares a final draft, incorporating any action taken by the Wildlife Board. The Proclamation Review Commission reviews the final draft
before publishing. Mr. Kimball distributed proclamations on fishing, big game, and antlerless
hunting.
MOTION: Rep. Evans moved to adjourn the meeting at 3:35 p.m. The motion passed unanimously.