Download Zipped File WP 6.1 0905NAEM.ZIP 4,585 Bytes

Natural Resources, Agriculture, and Environment Interim Committee

MINUTES OF THE

NATURAL RESOURCES, AGRICULTURE AND ENVIRONMENT

INTERIM COMMITTEE

Friday, September 5, 1997 - 8:00 a.m. - Red Canyon Room, Ruby's Inn



Members Present:
    Sen. Alarik Myrin, Cochair
    Rep. Bradley T. Johnson, Cochair
    Sen. R. Mont Evans
    Rep. Eli H. Anderson
    Rep. Craig W. Buttars
    Rep. Beverly A. Evans
    Rep. James R. Gowans
    Rep. Tom Hatch
    Rep. Dennis H. Iverson
    Rep. Evan L. Olsen
    Rep. Michael R. Styler


Members Excused:
    Sen. Joseph L. Hull
    Sen. Craig A. Peterson
    Rep. Melvin R. Brown
    Rep. Mary Carlson
    Rep. Jordan Tanner
    Rep. Daniel H. Tuttle
    Rep. Bill Wright

Staff Present:

    Ms. Constance C. Steffen,
        Research Analyst
    Ms. Jeanenne B. Larson,
        Associate General Counsel
    



     Note:    A list of others present and a copy of materials distributed in the meeting are on file in the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel.


1.    Welcome and Introductions - Chairman Myrin called the meeting to order at 8:12 a.m. Committee members, staff, and visitors introduced themselves.

2.    Grand Staircase - Escalante National Monument Management Plan - Kate Cannon, Associate Monument Manager, explained the public has a very significant role in determining how the monument will be managed. The monument planning team will have 16 scoping meetings within and outside the state to allow the public to tell them how to manage the monument. She added the team will also accept any written comments sent by mail or email. Ms. Cannon distributed a "Visions Kit" to each committee member. The kit includes a worksheet that may be completed by committee members to indicate how the monument should be managed. After the scoping meetings, the planning team will prepare management alternatives. The alternatives will deal with matters such as where visitors should be concentrated. The public will be asked to comment on the management alternatives. Finally, the team will prepare a preferred alternative.

    Rep. Hatch questioned whether the Secretary of the Interior may reject the preferred management alternative and devise a new management plan. Ms. Cannon stated the Secretary in revising the plan would have to use components forwarded by the planning team. She added it is

incumbent on the planning team to put forward an alternative that is palatable.

    Ms. Cannon noted that half of the monument is included in Wilderness Study Areas. The team cannot plan for those areas - Congress has to act on those areas. She assured the committee that prior rights, such as existing leases, may be exercised, but they will be subject to a higher level of scrutiny. The monument plan will not include the 176,000 acres of school trust lands or 15,000 acres of private lands. The owners of those lands may do what they want, and they are entitled to reasonable access. Hunting and fishing will be handled by the state.

    Bob Walton, Sierra Club, asserted the monument should be preserved intact. He recommended that: 1) no paved roads be built within the monument; 2) tourist infrastruture be constructed within the local communities; and 3) trust lands be traded out.

3.    Community and Economic Development - Ken Sizemore explained he is a liaison between the monument planning team and the Community and Economic Development Strategy Committee. The committee was established by the governor to coordinate local community planning with the monument plans and to assist local communities in preparing for the impacts imposed by the monument. He distributed a document showing the proposed mission statement of the committee.

4.     Comments of Local Officials - Louise Liston, Garfield County Commission, showed a map of the monument and noted that the boundaries are adjacent to Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, Capitol Reef National Park, and U.S. Forest Service lands. The monument reaches the Arizona border, but does not go into Arizona, even though the Grand Staircase extends to the Grand Canyon. She displayed a map showing that the Henrieville water system, including a pipeline and springs, is included within the monument. Another map depicted electric facilities of the Garkane Power Association within the monument. A document was distributed to committee members describing the Garkane power facilities affected by the monument.

    Commissioner Liston lamented that the federal government will never realize to what extent the monument designation has affected local communities. Planning is taking a significant amount of time for local officials. She noted the federal government has given Garfield County $100,000 this year for search and rescue services and $50,000 for sheriff services.

    The following issues of concern were noted by Commissioner Liston:

    1) Access to the monument needs to be worked out to properly plan, but the monument

manger doesn't want to discuss roads until litigation about the monument designation is over.
    2) The status of R.S. 2477 roads within the monument needs to be resolved.
    3) Additional public health infrastructure will be needed.

    Gary Edwards, Southwest Public Health Department, reiterated Commissioner Liston's concerns about public health infrastructure.

     MOTION: Rep. Anderson moved to adjourn the meeting at 10:15 a.m. The motion passed unanimously.


[Back to the Interim Directory][Back to the Monthly Schedule][Back to the Committee Listing] Utah State Legislature