University of Utah, indicated that he is the author of these reports. Mr. Wood discussed some of the
conclusions in the studies.
In discussing the first report, Mr. Wood indicated that rents in Salt Lake County have increased
60 percent since 1990 and moderated in '95 and '96. There are accelerating rates do to the decline in
new apartment construction. New construction statewide is down 45 percent. The last conclusion
from the first report was that we do need a reliable source for rental rate data. He indicated that there
is a need for a routine survey of the metropolitan and non-metropolitan area looking at rates and
developing good survey techniques.
Mr. Wood reported that the second report examines the recent increases in housing prices on
single family homes. He stated that housing prices have increased more in the last five years than in
any other state and noted that the data comes from a federal government source. If the data is taken
from 1980 - 1987, Utah ranks tenth with an average annual price increase of approximately 5 percent
over that period. In conclusion, Mr. Wood indicated that there is not a wide spread housing
affordability crisis for most Utah households. Existing home price sales have been near record levels
and home ownership rates in Utah have increased over that period. Mortgages have been below 8
percent for the last four or five years making it possible for people to afford homes. Mr. Wood
emphasized that the affordability index measures only the condition of the medium income families
and that there is little consolation for lower income families. He indicated that apartment structures
declined 45 percent but that it is not a reflection of market conditions.
Chair Montgomery said affordability to the first home buyer with very low income is real and
getting worse. One of the interests of the committee is to try and improve that situation.
Rep. Harper asked Mr. Wood if he has recommendations for the task force. Mr. Wood stated
that any initiative should begin at the state level and for the committee to look at what other
communities and states have done in their efforts to increase low-income family housing. He said that
there needs to be more uniformity in local zoning and regulations.
Rep. Harper asked what can be done to reduce the ordinate amount of pressure on elected
official in answering questions on these issue. Mr. Wood recommended starting with implementation
and enforcement and indicated that these ordinances are not only local but effect the general welfare of
the state.
Sen. Mansell explained that the reason for inflation on housing has taken place is not the lack of
availability. The key is affordable new housing.
Ms. Karen Silver, Salt Lake Community Action Program, said that her agency does foreclosure
counseling. She said that the agency is seeing people in higher and medium homes that are able to
maintain payments. Ms. Silver indicated that there is more selective zoning that is exclusionary to
families and recommended looking at our marketing issues and localities.
Ms. Carmen Hamilton, Mortgage Specialist/Key Bank, shared with the committee an unfair
incidence that she had witnessed regarding zoning.
Chair Montgomery questioned whether the state has a responsibility of requiring local
government to prevent these kinds of exclusionary practices. He said that this issue may be an area
that the committee should get involved in.
Ms. Linda Fox, Public Affairs, said that her agency has talked with a number of production
homebuilders discussing what they are trying to accomplish in the market place. Some of the
frustrations are price of land and the process of getting approvals. Ms. Fox stated that if there is
legislation, it has to be incentive based rather than something that punishes local government.
5. Redevelopment for Affordable Housing - Chair Montgomery introduced this agenda item. Ms. Alice Steiner, Utah Redevelopment Agency Association, and Executive Director, Salt Lake City
Development Agency addressed the committee. She distributed a handout from which she gave her
presentation. She discussed the statutory purposes of redevelopment agencies: 1) improve blighted
areas, both residential and commercial; 2) encouraging economic development which results in new
jobs for the state as a whole; and 3) encourage development of affordable housing. Ms. Steiner then
explained the process of developing redevelopment and economic development plans.
Chair Montgomery asked Ms. Steiner if there are any regulatory barriers that would increase
the agencies chances to divert moneys into affordable housing. Ms. Steiner's reply was if communities
felt they had an obligation to provide affordable housing they would view affordable housing as a more
viable plan in the community.
Committee discussion followed Ms. Steiner's presentation.
6. Discuss Task Force Priority Topics - Committee members completed a survey prioritizing potential discussion topics. The results of the survey were provided to the committee.
MOTION: Rep. Bigelow moved that the task force at its next meeting discuss the topics in the order the task force prioritized the topics. The motion passed unanimously.
7. Future Meeting Dates - The task force discussed the following two meeting dates:
Tuesday, October 14, 1997 at 9:00 am
Monday, November 10, 1997 at 9:00 a.m.
6. Adjourn - Rep. Harper moved to adjourn. The motion passed unanimously. Chair Montgomery adjourned the meeting at 12:01 p.m.