Download Zipped File WP 6.1 0715POLM.ZIP 6,693 Bytes

Political Subdivisions Interim Committee

MINUTES OF THE

POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS INTERIM COMMITTEE

Wednesday, July 15, 1998 - 2:00 p.m. - Room 414 State Capitol



Members Present:
    Sen. R. Mont Evans, Senate Chair
    Rep. David Ure, House Chair
    Sen. Leonard M. Blackham
    Rep. Brian R. Allen
    Rep. John B. Arrington
    Rep. DeMar "Bud" Bowman
    Rep. Craig W. Buttars
    Rep. Blake D. Chard
    Rep. Greg J. Curtis
    Rep. Marda Dillree
    Rep. James R. Gowans
    Rep. Richard L. Walsh


Members Excused:
    Sen. George Mantes

Members Absent:
    Rep. David L. Gladwell
    Rep. John E. Swallow

Staff Present:
    Mr. Joseph Wade,
        Research Analyst
    Mr. Robert H. Rees,
        Associate General Counsel
    Ms. Joy L. Miller,
        Secretary


     Note:    A list of others present and a copy of materials distributed in the meeting are on file in the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel.


1.    Call to Order and Committee Business - Rep. Ure called the meeting to order at 2:30 p.m. Due to lack of a quorum, the committee did not approve the minutes until later in the meeting.

2.    Follow up - Form of Government for a City Changing Classes - Mr. Rees reviewed proposed legislation, "City Forms of Government." The legislation provides that a change in a municipality's class does not affect its form of government. The legislation also makes explicit what was implicit before.

     HOUSE MOTION: Rep. Dillree moved that the House Committee recommend draft legislation, "City Forms of Government." The motion passed unanimously. Reps. Bowman, Curtis, and Walsh were absent during the vote.

3.    Special Districts Recodification - Rep. Ure reviewed the policy statements regarding special districts found on page 15 of the packet. He said there are many differences of opinion whether the boards of the districts should be elected or appointed.

    Mr. Dave Ovard, Utah Association of Special Districts, stated cities generally have direct liaison and work closely with the boards of special districts. He explained that for a single county district nominations would generally come from the county commission or from cities within the county. The county commission makes the appointments. For a multi-county district,

such as the Salt Lake County Water Conservancy District, nominations come from either the cities within the district or the county commission. The nominations are given to the governor who makes the appointment with the advise and consent of the Senate. Mr. Ovard indicated that generally the conservancy district agrees with the policy statements. He stated there needs to be some guidelines to determine when special districts should be created.

    Mr. Eckhard Bauer, Office of the State Auditor, indicated that special service districts are not all the same. He expressed concern over what would happen with bonding or tax rates if special district requirements are standardized.

    Mr. Rex Ausburn, Manager of the Snyderville Basin Sewer Improvement District, observed that at no time have any of the problems being discussed been totally associated with either the district being an independent or dependent district. The problems also have not been indicative of having an elected or appointed board. If the law is changed, it would reduce the flexibility that the cities and counties may need to help accomplish what their district is being asked to do. He offered his assistance to help identify solutions.

    Mr. Jan Furner, Utah Association of Special Districts, indicated that they are willing to participate in the process. He pointed out that special districts are not visible because they were created that way.

    Mr. Rees briefly reviewed a comparison of statutory governing body provisions concerning special districts which was mailed to the members. He distributed a list of policy issues for the committee to consider regarding independent special districts.

    Rep. Ure recommended an ad hoc workgroup be formed to address the specific issues. Rep. Dillree suggested that those who previously served on the Special Districts Subcommittee also serve on the workgroup since they already have the necessary background.

4.    Waiver of Governmental Immunity for Perjury by a Government Employee - Rep. Curtis explained that during the 1998 General Session, he introduced H.B. 97, Governmental Immunity Amendments. The legislation would have waived governmental immunity from actions seeking damages resulting from the perjury, the intentional making of a false statement, or the making of a false statement with reckless regard as to its truthfulness, by a government employee in any court or administrative hearing. In order to fine tune the language, he withdrew the legislation and requested the issue be studied during the interim.

    Mr. Matt Hilton, attorney, noted that the U.S. Supreme Court has said if someone commits perjury in a courtroom as a witness, it is not actionable as a civil rights claim. The Government Immunity Act states that if the state government or a municipality deprives an

individual of their civil rights, it is not actionable either. The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that a conspiracy to commit perjury is immune from damages under the Civil Rights Act. He said he has been involved in litigation where it was evident that a person in authority committed perjury. He briefly discussed a situation in Springville concerning the forgery of a government official on a plat. He stated there are times where it is necessary to facilitate addressing issues quickly and directly. That is the purpose of the proposed legislation.

    Rep. Curtis requested the committee consider the legislation from a conceptual point of view and determine if language can be drafted to address the problems. He asked if the Legislature would want to grant immunity to individuals or entities when false statements are intentionally made. The proposed concept simplifies the procedure and expands the liability of governmental entities for perjured or false statements.

    Mr. Steve Allred, head of the Litigation Department for Salt Lake City, said the federal law provides that if actions are done under color of authority and violative of someone's due process rights, they are actionable. The proposed legislation makes the employer strictly liable whether they were aware of the situation in question or not. Everything the bill intends to do is already permitted under federal civil rights litigation that can take place in either federal or state courts. He indicated the legislation is probably procedurally more difficult than the federal civil rights act. It would force him to represent an employee who may have done something wrong.

    Ms. Ruth Robinson, citizen, said in her personal situation, in order to justify her arrest, several issues were put in the police report that are not valid and are slanderous. Individuals need to be held responsible for making false statements against a person.

    Rep. Ure suggested Rep. Curtis file the proposed legislation and bring it back before the committee for further discussion.

     MOTION: Rep. Dillree moved to approve the minutes of June 17, 1998. The motion passed unanimously. Sen. Blackham and Rep. Walsh were absent during the vote.

     MOTION: Rep. Dillree moved that the full interim committee adopt draft legislation, "City Forms of Government," as a committee bill. The motion passed unanimously. Sen. Blackham was absent during the vote. (According to legislative rules, since Sen. Mantes has missed two consecutive meetings, only one senator was needed for a quorum.)

5.    Legislative Audit - Utah Technology Finance Corporation (UTFC) - Ms. Janice Coleman, Office of Legislative Auditor, explained that the Legislature asked them to look at three issues: 1) Is UTFC meeting its statutory mission? 2) Does UTFC have effective internal controls? and 3) Do the allegations that have been made against UTFC have any merit? She

indicated that in their opinion UTFC is moving away from primary aspects of its mission, notably the funding of startup or early stage high-technology companies. Ms. Coleman stated UTFC may have moved away from primary aspects of its mission as a result of legislative pressure. There has been informal pressure to become self-sufficient and to give more loans to rural companies. The Legislature should take this opportunity to consider what UTFC's mission should be now and make the necessary changes and clarifications to the Utah Code. She added they found that UTFC's operating efficiency also appears to be declining.

    Sen. Evans declared a conflict of interest and stated his wife works for a high-tech company, although he did not think they were directly involved with UTFC.

    Ms. Coleman recommended the Legislature clarify its position on the State Personnel Management Act. Currently UTFC is not exempted in the code from the act.

    Mr. Wayne Welsh, Legislative Auditor, observed that there may be some benefit from having UTFC exempted but it should not be exempted from following good personnel practices that other organizations have to follow. Mr. Welsh stated there are some things that should be clarified regarding UTFC's role and mission. Some of their role could be privatized or taken into state government through existing agencies.

    Mr. Duane Blackley, Acting UTFC Executive Director, stated as acting director, his efforts have been substantially towards restructuring UTFC's policies and procedures and mission and purpose. He distributed examples of what UTFC has done in establishing appropriate policies and procedures. He said that each of the recommendations have been carefully evaluated and incorporated into the system. One of the areas they had particular concern with dealt with employee relations. A new employee manual has been created and they have eliminated a category called compensatory time off. UTFC no longer allows cashing of vacation at any time during an individual's employment. Conflict of interest policies have been expanded to require affirmative disclosure by employees and board members. Policy now requires advance approval of out of state travel by any member. UTFC has reduced expense categories by $950,000. Many programs that were nonrevenue related have been eliminated.

    Ms. Clair Geddes, United We Stand, distributed copies of two newspaper articles regarding UTFC. She said she has been following the agency since 1993. A few years ago she met with the former executive director, Don Welti, who assured her that the problems from the past would not happen again. She has tried to bring the problems associated with UTFC to the attention of the Legislature for the last several years.

     MOTION: Rep. Dillree moved to adjourn the meeting at 5:05 p.m. The motion passed unanimously.


[Back to the Interim Directory][Back to the Monthly Schedule][Back to the Committee Listing] Utah State Legislature