Download Zipped File WP 6.1 1112EDTM.ZIP 8,044 Bytes

MINUTES OF

ELECTRICAL DEREGULATION AND CUSTOMER CHOICE TASK FORCE

Thursday, November 12, 1998 - 9:00 a.m. - Room 303 State Capitol


Members Present:
    Sen. Leonard M. Blackham, Senate Chair
    Rep. Beverly Ann Evans, House Chair
    Sen. Lorin V. Jones
    Sen. Eddie "Ed" P. Mayne
    Sen. Millie M. Peterson
    Sen. Michael G. Waddoups
    Rep. Judy Ann Buffmire
    Rep. Christine R. Fox-Finlinson
    Rep. J. Brent Haymond
    Rep. David Ure



Members Excused:
    Rep. Kevin S. Garn

Staff Present:
    Mr. Brian Allred,
        Research Analyst
    Mr. Robert H. Rees,
        Associate General Counsel
    Ms. Patricia Owen,
        Associate General Counsel
    Ms. Beverlee LeCheminant
        Legislative Secretary        


Note:    A list of others present and handouts distributed are on file in the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel.

1.    Welcome - Approval of Minutes of September 25 and October 8, 1998 - Rep. Evans called the meeting to order at 9:20 a.m.

     MOTION: Sen. Peterson moved to approve the minutes of the September 25 and October 8, 1998 meetings. The motion passed unanimously with Reps. Haymond and Ure absent for the vote.

2.    Environmental Issues, Alternative Energy, Energy Efficiency, Renewable Energy -

    a.    Introduction and Background - Commissioner Steve Mecham, Public Service Commission (PSC), told the committee that the PSC created a subcommittee to study environmental issues, alternative energy, energy efficiency, and renewable energy. He indicated that the subcommittee looked at the following issues: 1) consumer protections; 2) stable and nondiscriminatory prices; 3) universal service and protections for low-income or vulnerable customers; 4) environmental mitigation; and 5) long-range planning and sustainable source of energy. He stated that the subcommittee submitted a report to the PSC on the benefits that the current system of utility regulation offers that might not survive in a competitive market. The report also enumerated two ways to preserve the system benefits that are available under the current system: 1) making certain requirements in the licensing process for industries to do business in the state; and 2) raising money to pursue these programs.

    b.    Panel Discussion

    Ms. Ellen Eckels, Wasatch Clean Air Coalition (Coalition), indicated that the Coalition believes that air quality in Utah is a matter of vital importance for the citizens of the state and that

guidelines exist for Utah in the laws of other states in the deregulation process. She stated that it is important to assure by law that no supplier of electricity is enable to undersell competitors because of weaker environmental practices. She noted that most states are providing green energy options for their consumers which is an important way to enlist the help of citizens in preserving air clean enough to breathe safely and the more conservation and renewable energy sources are emphasized, the less fossil fuel burning will take place as utilities attempt to provide the energy necessary to supply Utah's rapidly expanding population. She told the task force that the Coalition would request that a task force hearing be rescheduled on environmental issues and their legislative resolutions.

    Ms. Nina Dougherty, Utah Chapter, Sierra Club, distributed a "Report of the Grand Canyon Visibility Transport Commission to the United States Environmental Protection Agency and a letter from Governor Leavitt to Carol M. Browner, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. She pointed out that provisions in electric utility deregulation laws and regulations are needed to ensure: 1) that there are comparable emissions standards for all electric-generating facilities, regardless of age; 2) that there are milestones and mechanisms for increasing the use of clean and renewable energy resources; and 3) that there are milestones and mechanisms for increasing efficiency in the end use of energy.

    Mr. Bruce Driver, Land and Water Fund of the Rockies, urged the task force to include three specific recommendations in its final report to the Legislature: 1) resource decisions by the industry can have significant environmental impacts; 2) investments in renewable resources and energy efficiency should be encouraged to help the industry minimize its impact on the environment; and 3) measures should be adopted to ensure that competition will not harm, but will expand investment in clean power resources. He urged the Legislature to further study green marketing, systems benefit charges, renewable resource portfolio standards, and other measures designed to encourage the industry to play its part in maintaining and enhancing Utah's environment.

    Mr. Jeff Burks, Office of Energy and Resource Planning, urged the task force to consider how programs and policies should be reevaluated for energy efficiency and renewable energy as it moves to a deregulated electric industry. He stated that these policies and programs were designed in a regulated market and may no longer, in their present form, be relevant as the state moves to a restructured competitive electricity market. He suggested five guiding principals that should be considered and made part of the task force's final report: 1) the Legislature should create an industry structure that promotes competition in the provision of electricity supply and the provision of retail energy services to customers; 2) informed customers and suppliers are an essential ingredient of efficiently operating competitive markets; 3) policies, programs, and institutions created to promote energy efficiency and renewable energy during the transition should adopt market-based incentives and transformation strategies that directly target specific market barriers and attempt to create lasting structural or behavioral changes; 4) mechanisms for programs to fund energy efficiency and renewable energy during a defined transition period should be broad based, nonbypassable, competitively neutral, and small in proportion to total system revenues; and 5) an independent third

party should be established to manage energy efficiency and renewable energy market transformation activities. He stated that market barriers will continue to be prevalent in the transition to competitive utility markets and it is critical that the Legislature and regulators continue to support these programs.
    
    Task force discussion followed.

3.    Task Force Consideration and Approval of Final Report - The task force reviewed the proposed draft task force report and considered changes to the draft. Changes adopted by the task force include:

    *     replacing the word "stranded" with the word "transition" throughout the report;
    *     deleting "Although supportive of retail competition in the electric industry when conditions are appropriate" on line 1 in the Executive Summary and inserting "until conditions are appropriate" after the word "premature" on line 3;
    *     deleting "although not comprehensive" on page 2, paragraph 2, of the General Background;
    *     including the chart on page 3, which shows the residential, commercial, and industrial costs, in the appendix;
    *     inserting the word "generally" in the bold face on page 4, third paragraph of the General Background after the words "cooperatives are";
    *     after the words "own rates" inserting "with certain limitations"; and after the words "cooperatives are" insert the word "otherwise.";
    *     deleting "will appear" after the words "voter-initiated measures" and after the words "restructuring legislation" inserting "failed" in the fourth paragraph on page 4 of the General Background;
    *     adding a sentence to the fourth paragraph on page 6 of the General Background which reads "Potential risks to these smaller consumers include higher prices, decreased reliability, and degraded customer service.";
    *     inserting the word "Geographic" before the word "aggregation" under the third bullet on page six and adding a sentence at the end of the bullet which reads: "Geographic aggregation may also limit the choices available to customers.";
    *     inserting the following language at the end of the task force conclusions and recommendations on page 7: "regulate marketing practices to protect against invasions of privacy; and provide purchasing options for consumers including "green power.";
    *     including a section on environmental issues;
    *     adding the following language to the third bullet under task force conclusions and recommendations on page 10: "It appears that a regional or larger ISO is more effective than an ISO limited to one state. In addition, it must be demonstrated that adequate transmission capabilities exist for wheeling electricity in and out of the state."
    *     amending language relating to unbundling;


     *     changing language on page 7 in the first bullet under task force conclusions and recommendations to read: "The task force believes that Utah customers of investor- owned utilities, rural cooperatives, and municipal power providers, especially residential and small business customers, may be at risk in a competitive market unless adequate consumer protections are established and until effective competition is demonstrated."

    The task force adopted a recommendation that:

    1.    the Legislature
        a.    continue to explore possible electrical restructuring in and its effects on Utah;
        b.    remain informed about developments in electrical restructuring on the federal level and in other states; and
        c.    continue to monitor closely other states that have implemented an electrical restructuring plan to learn from their experience.

    2.    the Legislature enact legislation during the 1999 General Session to reauthorize the task force for an additional two years.
        a.    The task force will study the items listed under item 1.
        b.    The task force would meet at least twice each year but can meet quarterly, as needed. If necessary, the chairs of the task force could ask for approval by Legislative Management to meet more often.
        c.    The Legislature should authorize and direct the Public Service Commission to study electrical restructuring, keep abreast of developments on the federal level and in other states, work with the task force, and report as directed to the task force.
        d.    In addition, the task force can draw on other public and private resources as part of its study.
        e.    The task force will report at least annually to the Public Utilities and Technology Interim Committee.

    3.    the Legislature repeal Section 54-7-12.3, which was enacted in 1997 through H.B. 313 and is now obsolete. Section 54-7-12.3 directs the task force to study certain matters and imposes a rate freeze that has expired.

     MOTION: Rep. Buffmire moved to give staff the authority to make technical changes to the report prior to printing it. The motion passed unanimously with Reps. Becker and Ure absent for the vote.

     MOTION: Sen. Waddoups moved to adjourn the meeting. The motion passed unanimously with Sen. Mayne and Reps. Haymond and Ure absent for the vote.
    
    The meeting adjourned at 1:20 p.m.



[Back to the Interim Directory][Back to the Monthly Schedule][Back to the Committee Listing] Utah State Legislature