Download Zipped Introduced WP 9 SB0116.ZIP
[Status][Bill Documents][Fiscal Note][Bills Directory]
S.B. 116
1
DNA - AMENDMENT REGARDING WARRANTS
2
2003 GENERAL SESSION
3
STATE OF UTAH
4
Sponsor: Lyle W. Hillyard
5
This act modifies the Criminal Code, removing the statute of limitations on certain
6
violent crimes when DNA evidence has been collected that can be used to identify the
7
perpetrator.
8
This act affects sections of Utah Code Annotated 1953 as follows:
9
AMENDS:
10
76-1-302, as last amended by Chapter 5, Laws of Utah 1990
11
Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
12
Section 1.
Section
76-1-302
is amended to read:
13
76-1-302. Time limitations for prosecution of offenses -- Provisions if DNA
14
evidence would identify the defendant -- Commencement of prosecution.
15
(1) Except as otherwise provided, a prosecution for:
16
(a) a felony or negligent homicide shall be commenced within four years after it is
17
committed;
18
(b) a misdemeanor other than negligent homicide shall be commenced within two years
19
after it is committed; and
20
(c) any infraction shall be commenced within one year after it is committed.
21
(2) (a) A prosecution for the offenses listed in Subsections 76-3-203.5(1)(c)(i)(A)
22
through (P) may be commenced at any time if the identity of the person who committed the
23
crime is unknown but DNA evidence is collected that would identify the person at a later date.
24
(b) Subsection (2)(a) does not apply if the statute of limitations on a crime has run as of
25
May 5, 2003, and no charges have been filed.
26
(3) If the statute of limitations would have run but for the provisions of Subsection (2)
27
and identification of a perpetrator is made through DNA, a prosecution shall be commenced
28
within one year of the discovery of the identity of the perpetrator.
29
[(2)] (4) A prosecution is commenced upon the finding and filing of an indictment by a
30
grand jury or upon the filing of a complaint or information.
Legislative Review Note
as of 1-20-03 3:23 PM
A limited legal review of this legislation raises no obvious constitutional or statutory concerns.