Download Zipped Introduced WordPerfect SB0117.ZIP
[Status][Bill Documents][Fiscal Note][Bills Directory]
S.B. 117
1
EMINENT DOMAIN AMENDMENTS
2
2006 GENERAL SESSION
3
STATE OF UTAH
4
Chief Sponsor: Howard A. Stephenson
5
House Sponsor:
David Ure
6
7
LONG TITLE
8
General Description:
9
This bill modifies provisions related to eminent domain.
10
Highlighted Provisions:
11
This bill:
12
. requires the taking of property by a county, city, or town to be approved by the
13
legislative body of the county, city, or town;
14
. requires the governing body of a political subdivision intending to take property by
15
eminent domain to provide written notice to property owners of each public meeting
16
to approve the taking and allow property owners the right to be heard regarding the
17
proposed taking;
18
. modifies the duty to negotiate with a property owner and the duty to notify the
19
property owner of certain rights and limitations with respect to an anticipated
20
eminent domain action; and
21
. clarifies that those duties apply to each person seeking to acquire property involving
22
the potential use of eminent domain if the property cannot be acquired in a
23
voluntary transaction.
24
Monies Appropriated in this Bill:
25
None
26
Other Special Clauses:
27
None
28
Utah Code Sections Affected:
29
AMENDS:
30
78-34-4, as last amended by Chapter 161, Laws of Utah 1981
31
78-34-4.5, as enacted by Chapter 223, Laws of Utah 2004
32
33
Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
34
Section 1.
Section
78-34-4
is amended to read:
35
78-34-4. Conditions precedent to taking.
36
(1) Before property can be taken it must appear:
37
[(1)] (a) that the use to which it is to be applied is a use authorized by law;
38
[(2)] (b) that the taking is necessary to such use;
39
[(3)] (c) that construction and use of all property sought to be condemned will
40
commence within a reasonable time as determined by the court, after the initiation of
41
proceedings under this chapter; and
42
[(4)] (d) if already appropriated to some public use, that the public use to which it is to
43
be applied is a more necessary public use.
44
(2) Property may not be taken by a county, city, or town unless the legislative body of
45
the county, city, or town approves the taking.
46
(3) (a) As used in this Subsection (3), "governing body" means:
47
(i) for a county, city, or town, the legislative body of the county, city, or town; and
48
(ii) for any other political subdivision of the state, the person or body with authority to
49
govern the affairs of the political subdivision.
50
(b) Before voting to approve the taking of property, the governing body of each
51
political subdivision intending to take property shall provide written notice to each owner of
52
property to be taken of each public meeting of the political subdivision's governing body at
53
which a vote on the proposed taking is expected to occur and allow the property owner the
54
opportunity to be heard on the proposed taking.
55
Section 2.
Section
78-34-4.5
is amended to read:
56
78-34-4.5. Negotiation and disclosure required before eminent domain action.
57
Each person who seeks to acquire property by eminent domain or who intends to use
58
eminent domain to acquire property if the property cannot be acquired in a voluntary
59
transaction shall:
60
(1) before voting to approve the taking of property or initiating an eminent domain
61
action, make a reasonable effort to negotiate with the property owner for the purchase of the
62
property; and
63
(2) as early in the negotiation process under Subsection (1) as practicable but no later
64
than 14 days before [the] voting to approve the taking of property or filing [of] an eminent
65
domain action, unless the court for good cause allows a shorter period before filing:
66
(a) advise the property owner of the owner's rights to mediation and arbitration under
67
Section
78-34-21
, including the name and current telephone number of the property rights
68
ombudsman, established in Section
63-34-13
; and
69
(b) provide the property owner a written statement explaining that oral representations
70
or promises made during the negotiation process are not binding upon the person seeking to
71
acquire the property by eminent domain.
Legislative Review Note
as of 10-18-05 11:27 AM
Based on a limited legal review, this legislation has not been determined to have a high
probability of being held unconstitutional.